IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA

AT

(Plaintiff)

(Defendant 1)

(Defendant 2) CASE NO:

DENIAL OF PATERNITY PETITION

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Trial in this case was held on

Settlement was placed on the record on

A default hearing in this case was held on

Plaintiff: did not appear. appeared in person. appeared remotely.

Plaintiff was represented by self.	.

Defendant 1: did not appear. appeared in person. appeared remotely.

Defendant 1 was represented by self.	.

Defendant 2: did not appear. appeared in person. appeared remotely. N/A.

Defendant 2 was represented by self.	.

The record shows that Defendant 1 Defendant 2 was served with the summons and complaint, and

Defendant 1 Defendant 2 did not file an answer or otherwise deny the facts in the complaint, and the case continued without hearing from the non-answering Defendant(s) (default).

Defendant 1 Defendant 2 signed the complaint or filed an answer that agreed with the facts in the complaint (uncontested).

Defendant 1 Defendant 2 filed an answer and all parties later agreed on all issues (settlement).

Defendant 1 Defendant 2 filed an answer and the court held a trial (contested).

The court considered any testimony and examined any evidence or agreements presented. The court now makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. Plaintiff is a resident of	. Defendant 1 is a resident of	. Defendant 2 is a resident of	.

is the biological mother of each child involved in this case and listed below:

Child’s Name	Date of Birth	State of Residence

2. The Court does not find by clear and convincing evidence that

is disestablished as the legal father of the children.

is the biological father of the children.

the children’s birth certificates should be changed.

the child support order issued on	[date] should be changed.

3. Other findings of fact:

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

1.	This court has jurisdiction over the parties and issues involved in this proceeding, including paternity of each child listed above.

2.	There is insufficient evidence to disestablish establish anyone as the legal and/or biological father of the children.

3.	Other conclusions of law:

Date	Superior Court Judge

Recommended for approval: Superior Court Master Date

Print or Type Name

I certify that on	, a copy of this document was distributed to:

Plaintiff/Lawyer Defendant 1/Lawyer Defendant 2/Lawyer

Clerk/JA: