IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA

AT

)

)

Plaintiff	)

)

)

)	Case No.

Defendant	)

)

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

(DIVORCE NO CHILDREN)

Trial in this case was held on

Settlement was placed on the record on

Default hearing in this case was held on

Plaintiff:	did not appear	appeared in person	appeared remotely

Plaintiff was represented by self attorney

Defendant:	did not appear	appeared in person	appeared remotely

Defendant was represented by self attorney

The record shows the Defendant was served with summons and complaint for divorce, and

Default: Defendant did not file an answer or otherwise defend, and the matter proceeded by default.

Uncontested: Defendant joined in signing the complaint filed an answer and did not contest the facts alleged or prayer for relief in the complaint.

Settlement: Defendant filed an answer and the parties settled all issues.

Contested: Defendant filed an answer and the parties proceeded to trial.

The court considered testimony and examined any evidence or agreements presented. The court now makes the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth below.

FINDINGS OF FACT

BACKGROUND

1.	Plaintiff defendant is a resident of the State of Alaska.

2.	The parties married in	on

and ever since have been married to each other.

3.	There are no minor children and neither party is currently pregnant.

4.	The parties permanently separated on

5.	An incompatibility of temperament exists between the parties which makes it impossible for them to remain together as a married couple.

6.	Plaintiff asks to restore this prior name:

Defendant asks to restore this prior name:

7.	Other:

PROPERTY ALLOCATION

1.	Assets and debts to be awarded to plaintiff

Plaintiff should retain all assets and debts now in plaintiff’s possession and control.

Plaintiff should be awarded the following property and allocated the following debt:

Assets Awarded to Plaintiff	Value ($)

Debts Allocated to Plaintiff	Value ($)

Total value of assets to plaintiff

Less value of debts to plaintiff

Equals net value to plaintiff

2.	Assets and debts to be awarded to defendant

Defendant should retain all assets and debts now in defendant’s possession and control.

Defendant should be awarded the following property and allocated the following debt:

Assets Awarded to Defendant	Value ($)

Debts Allocated to Defendant	Value ($)

Total value of assets to defendant

Less value of debts to defendant

Equals net value to defendant

3.	After considering the factors in AS 25.24.160, the court finds that the above property and debt allocation is fair and equitable requires the following cash offset in order to be fair and equitable:

Plaintiff to pay to defendant the amount of $	within	days

Defendant to pay to plaintiff the amount of $	within	days

4.	Other:

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

A.	The court has personal jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter jurisdiction over the marriage.

B.	A decree of divorce should be issued forever severing the bonds of matrimony now existing between the parties.

C.	Property and debt(s) should be allocated as set forth above, which is fair and equitable.

D.	The plaintiff’s prior name should be restored.

The defendant’s prior name should be restored.

E.	Other conclusion(s) of law:

ENTERED this day of , 20

Recommended for approval:	Superior Court Master	Date

JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT

Print or Type Name

I certify that on

a copy of this document was sent or given to:

Clerk: